This post appeared on the Social Psychology Eye blog. An excerpt is below, to view the full post click here.
Although Susan Sontag famously argued that “there is no such thing as collective memory,” a recent article by Roediger (2009) considers the burgeoning field of collective memory and a number of oral history and other cultural projects are forming to “preserve” such memories.
Memories themselves are tricky and many social psychological studies suggest that we use a sort of “backward reasoning” when we recall memories such that we recreate them in nuanced ways to fit our current life situation. The recall of memories isn’t as perfect as say, flipping through a photo album. This was probably Sontag’s point, as she argues, “all memory is individual, unreproducible — it dies with the person.”
If that is the case then, what are the value of studies aimed at capturing and documenting collective memories? [...]






In the States, the Obama administration and Fox News Channel have recently “declared war.” The argument is essentially that the “talk-radio format” of the evening commentary programs undercuts the network’s credibility as a news organization and the Obama administration has indicated they will not interact with the network on this level. And yet, Fox News is enjoying some of its highest ratings ever.
On September 30 Wiley-Blackwell announced the winner of their inaugural
Narcissism is itself a slippery concept that psychologists have debated for years. How to define it and how to measure it have been looming questions as well as the extent to which a certain level of narcissism may be adaptive in a psychological sense. More recently, however, 
Recent